WH Lawyer Uses Democrats’ Past Arguments to Destroy ‘Obstruction’ Case Against Trump

WH Lawyer Uses Democrats’ Past Arguments to Destroy ‘Obstruction’ Case Against Trump

WH Lawyer Uses Democrats’ Past Arguments to Destroy ‘Obstruction’ Case Against Trump

Senate TV / Getty

White House lawyer Patrick Philbin calmly demolished House Democrats’ second article of impeachment during President Donald Trump’s trial in the Senate on Monday — using Democrats’ own past arguments.

Phil bin began by explaining the reasons that the White House had resisted congressional subpoenas — not because of a “blanket” refusal, but for three separate reasons. One was that the House had not yet voted to authorize an impeachment inquiry. Another was that the Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel told the president to reject subpoenas for senior aides under Supreme Court precedent protecting the deliberations of presidential advisers. And a third was that the House took the unusual step of barring agency counsel from attending depositions, so that the executive branch could protect its privileges when they arose.

Philbin then explained that leading Democrats, and their advisers, had all argued that the president could not be impeached simply for asserting impeached for asserting constitutional and legal privileges and rights.

House Democrats’ obstruction theory is wrong, first and foremost, because in a government of laws, asserting privileges and rights to resist compulsion is not obstruction. It’s a fundamental right. In Bordenkircher v. Hayes, the Supreme Court explained, “To punish a person because he has done the law plainly allows him to do is a due process violation of the most basic sort, and for an agent of the state to pursue a course of action whose objective is to penalize a person’s reliance on his legal rights, is patently unconstitutional.

Philbin: This is a principle that, in the past, in the [Bill] Clinton impeachment, was recognized across the board — that it would be improper to suggest that asserting rights is an impeachable offense. Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe said, “The allegations that invoking privileges and otherwise using the judicial system to shift information is an abuse of power that should lead to impeachment and removal from office is not only frivolous, but also dangerous. And manager [Jerry] Nadler then said that the use of a legal privilege is not illegal or impeachable by itself — a legal privilege, executive privilege. And Minority Leader [Chuck] Schumer, in the Clinton impeachment, expressed the same view.

Schumer (on video): “To suggest that any subject of an investigation, much less the president … implications to the institution of the presidency is abusing power and interfering with an investigation by making legitimate legal claims using due process and asserting constitutional rights is beyond serious consideration.

Philbin noted later that Nadler and lead House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) had claimed that asserting privileges was evidence of guilt, that “only guilty people try to hide the evidence.”

“Really?” Philbin asked. “Is that the principle in the United States of America, that if you assert legal privileges or rights, that means you are guilty?”

Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard College, and a J.D. from Harvard Law School. He is a winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.

Read More

Share:

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin

More News

Ryan Helfenbein: We Cannot Save the Free Economy by Destroying It

Ryan Helfenbein: We Cannot Save the Free Economy by Destroying It

Rahm Emanuel once famously stated, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” As of Saturday night, the total number of cases of the coronavirus in the U.S. exceeded 120,000, with the total number of deaths over 2,000. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has lost over 25% of its value from its mid-February… … Read More

Coronavirus: Illegal Aliens Go on Hunger Strike to Demand Release by ICE

Coronavirus: Illegal Aliens Go on Hunger Strike to Demand Release by ICE

Illegal aliens held in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody at a Pennsylvania facility have started a hunger strike to demand their release in the midst of the Chinese coronavirus crisis. On Saturday, the open borders group known as the Movement of Immigration Leaders in Pennsylvania organization announced illegal aliens currently held in a York, Pennsylvania,… … Read More

Pandemic Historian: Coronavirus ‘a Disease of Globalization’

Pandemic Historian: Coronavirus ‘a Disease of Globalization’

The Chinese coronavirus “is emphatically a disease of globalization,” a pandemic historian at Yale University says. In an interview published in the Wall Street Journal, Yale University’s Frank Snowden — a historian who most recently in 2006 published a book about Italy’s eradication of malaria — details how the coronavirus pandemic is threatening the globalist worldview… … Read More

McCarthy: Pelosi Wants Fourth Coronavirus Package with Liberal Priorities –

McCarthy: Pelosi Wants Fourth Coronavirus Package with Liberal Priorities –

In an appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Sunday Morning Futures,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) warned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) was looking to a fourth coronavirus relief package from Congress to accomplish liberal priorities, including changes to the voting laws and to fund project items like the Green New Deal and Planned Parenthood.BARTIROMO:… … Read More

FOLLOW

© Copyright 2020 | American Priority | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy